Trump’s Executive Order Seeks to Limit Independent Agencies’ Authority
WASHINGTON, D.C. — President Trump has issued an executive order that could significantly weaken independent federal agencies, restricting their ability to take legal and regulatory actions without direct approval from the White House. This move raises concerns about political interference in agencies designed to operate based on expertise rather than partisan interests.
Impact on Federal Oversight and Public Safety
If enforced, the executive order would reduce the autonomy of agencies responsible for protecting consumers, overseeing financial markets, and ensuring public safety. Key regulatory bodies, such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, National Transportation Safety Board, and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, were established by Congress to make expert-driven decisions, often independent of political influence. The new directive could hinder their ability to act in the public’s best interest.
Concerns Over Political Influence in Regulatory Decisions
Critics argue that the order is a direct attempt to centralize power, effectively preventing agency experts from exploring independent solutions to national challenges. By limiting agencies’ authority, the administration may prevent them from addressing fraud in financial markets, ensuring nuclear safety, or mitigating risks in transportation and energy sectors.
NRDC’s Response to the Executive Order
Michael Wall, Chief Litigation Officer at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), strongly criticized the order, stating:
“Every American depends on independent agencies for their safety and well-being—whether as a bank depositor, airline traveler, or utility customer. This executive order attempts to strip these agencies of their ability to act in the public’s best interests without political interference.”
He warned that the consequences could be severe, questioning whether power outages, financial fraud, or safety failures could result from a government weakened by executive overreach.
A Broader Effort to Undermine Federal Governance?
Wall also connected this order to broader trends within the administration, citing mass firings of federal workers and refusals to uphold federal contracts.
“This administration is systematically weakening federal oversight so that corporate interests can pollute more, build unchecked infrastructure, and defraud investors.”
Calls for Congressional and Judicial Action
The executive order has triggered calls for Congress and the courts to intervene. Wall urged lawmakers to push back against these overreaches, protect federal agencies, and ensure they retain the authority necessary to serve the public.
“The president is just one part of our constitutional system. Congress must stand up against these actions, and the courts must ensure checks and balances remain intact.”
Legal Challenges and Future Implications
Legal experts predict that the executive order will face significant court challenges. Independent agencies were designed to function with a degree of separation from the executive branch, a principle upheld in past Supreme Court rulings. If overturned, this case could set a precedent reaffirming the autonomy of regulatory bodies and limiting presidential overreach.
As legal battles unfold, the debate continues over the role of independent agencies and whether they should be shielded from political interference. The outcome of this case will shape the future of federal oversight and regulatory authority in the United States.
Original story by: NRDC
NRDC “works to safeguard the earth —its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends.” https://www.nrdc.org/about
- Original Story:
- Story By:
- Date:
- Please Support: